Monitoring & Evaluation Challenges in CSR Projects in India

Organisations have spent billions on development initiatives across the nation in the decade since India became the first country to mandate Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) through the Companies Act of 2013. However, effective Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems that precisely assess effectiveness and guarantee accountability are still needed, even though funding for social programs has been flowing steadily.

The Current CSR Landscape in India

India's Companies Act requires businesses with a net worth of at least ₹500 crore, turnover of at least ₹1,000 crore, or net profit of at least ₹5 crore to devote 2% of their average net profits from the past three years toward CSR initiatives. The penalties for non-compliance and the standards for compliance have been reinforced by recent amendments.

According to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Indian companies collectively spent over ₹29,000 crore on CSR activities in FY 2023-24. However, questions about these investments' effectiveness and sustainable impact persist. This underscores the critical importance of having robust M&E frameworks.

Key Monitoring & Evaluation Challenges in Indian CSR Projects

1. Output-Focused vs. Outcome-Focused Measurement

Many CSR programs in India remain fixated on output metrics (number of beneficiaries, schools constructed, training sessions held) rather than outcome metrics that measure actual social change and impact. A joint study conducted by PMI and KPMG found that Indian companies heavily focus on tracking output indicators. And often, they lag in systematically measuring the long-term outcomes and impacts of their initiatives.

2. Limited Baseline Data and Context Understanding

Effective M&E requires baseline data to measure progress accurately. However, many CSR projects in India are implemented without adequate preliminary research or needs assessment. It becomes difficult to demonstrate meaningful change or attribute improvements to specific interventions in the absence of reliable baseline information.

3. Technical Capacity and Resource Constraints

NGOs and implementing partners often lack specialized M&E knowledge and resources necessary to design and carry out extensive evaluation frameworks. Small and medium-sized implementing organizations typically allocate 3 - 7% of project budgets to M&E activities, which is insufficient for rigorous impact assessment. Furthermore, the development sector faces a shortage of trained M&E professionals, particularly in tier-2 and tier-3 cities where a large number of CSR initiatives are carried out. Nearly 60% of companies report that their implementation partners fall short when it comes to effectively conveying impact and delivering insightful reports, according to the India CSR Outlook Report 2023.

4. Short-Term Project Cycles vs. Long-Term Impact

The majority of CSR projects follow yearly funding cycles, but meaningful social change requires sustained, long-term engagement. This temporal mismatch creates a fundamental evaluation dilemma. Corporate funders often expect demonstrable results within unrealistic timeframes. Due to this, implementing partners are left with no choice but to focus on easily measurable short-term outputs rather than investing in systems that can track gradual and sustainable change.

5. Standardization vs. Contextualization

It is very challenging to strike the correct balance between contextualized indicators that reflect local nuances and standardized measurements that enable comparison across projects. The diverse nature of CSR initiatives spanning education, healthcare, livelihoods, and environmental sustainability makes it challenging to develop unified measurement frameworks. However, it is nearly impossible to aggregate impact assessment without standardisation.

Practical Solutions and Way Forward

1. Theory of Change-Based M&E Frameworks: Develop theories of change that map the pathway from inputs to long-term impact. This method offers a logical framework for evaluation as it helps in identifying appropriate indicators at each stage of the impact chain.

2. Participatory M&E Approaches: Engage beneficiaries and community members in designing evaluation frameworks and data collection. Participatory approaches increase local capacity and ownership while also enhancing the quality and relevance of the data.

3. Balanced Scorecard Approach: Use balanced scorecard methodologies that integrate quantitative metrics with qualitative assessments in a number of areas, including financial efficiency, beneficiary satisfaction, process enhancements, and long-term effects.

4. Collaborative Industry Standards: Develop sector-specific M&E standards through multi-stakeholder collaboration. Industry associations can play a pivotal role in establishing common metrics and evaluation procedures.

5. Technology-Enabled Hybrid Solutions: Design M&E systems that combine digital tools with traditional data collection methods to overcome challenges such as connectivity while also leveraging technology's advantages.

6. Strategic Resource Allocation: Earmark adequate resources specifically for M&E activities, ideally 8-10% of project budgets. This investment can offer significant returns through improved project effectiveness and sustainability.

Conclusion

As India's CSR ecosystem evolves, the focus must shift from compliance and spending to meaningful impact creation. Robust monitoring and evaluation systems should not be seen as merely accountability tools but strategic assets that drive continuous improvement and maximize social return on investment. By addressing the challenges and implementing thoughtful solutions, businesses can transform their CSR efforts from charitable obligations into catalysts for sustainable development that create lasting value for communities and businesses alike.

To create context-appropriate M&E frameworks that strike a balance between rigor and practicality, corporations, implementing partners, government agencies, and communities must work together. Only then will India's groundbreaking CSR requirement be able to reach its full potential as a socially beneficial transformational force.

‍

Call to Action

Corporate CSR Leaders should:

• Make a commitment to raise M&E allocations to at least 8-10% of project budgets
• Develop longer funding cycles (3-5 years) that enables meaningful impact measurement
• Invest in capacity building for implementing partners' M&E capabilities

For Implementation Partners and NGOs:

• Prioritize baseline studies before project implementation
• Develop clearly articulated theories of change for all interventions and include community participation into your M&E frameworks from design through implementation

For Industry Associations:

• Encourage the creation of standardized measures unique to a certain sector
• Create platforms for knowledge sharing on M&E best practices

For Policymakers:

• Develop guidelines that promote quality of impact over quantity of spending
• Create incentives for corporations that demonstrate rigorous impact evaluation
• Invest in public data infrastructure that can support baseline assessments

By taking these concrete steps, all stakeholders can contribute to transforming India's CSR ecosystem into one that not only meets compliance requirements but genuinely advances sustainable development goals through evidence-based interventions.

‍