Bridging the Healthcare Gap: CSR as a Catalyst for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) — A 2025 Perspective

Bridging the Healthcare Gap: CSR as a Catalyst for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) — a 2025 perspective

Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is the idea that everyone should have access to quality health services without financial hardship remains central to the 2030 SDG agenda. By 2025 the world faced a mixed picture: important gains in access to care and digital health were accompanied by persistent inequities, stagnating service coverage in many countries, and the risk of backsliding on immunization and primary care. That duality makes this decade critical: public systems need investment and innovation, and corporate actors can play a catalytic, accountable role. (World Health Organization, 2025)

Where we stand in 2025 — key facts that shape opportunity

• WHO’s global UHC agenda set ambitious targets for the 2020s including moving 1 billion more people to benefit from UHC by 2025 but progress is uneven and requires urgent intensification of investments in primary health care, health workforce, and data systems. (World Health Organization, 2025)
• The WHO World Health Statistics 2025 and UN SDG reports show that while many countries have improved indicators, service coverage has stagnated in others and major gaps remain in routine immunization, maternal & child health, and financial protection. These gaps disproportionately affect the poorest and those exposed to climate shocks.(World Health Organization, 2025)
• India’s flagship health assurance scheme, Ayushman Bharat – PM-JAY, remains central to India’s UHC push: the program design estimates around 550 million eligible beneficiaries and, as implementation progressed, more than 36.9 crore Ayushman cards had been created by March 2025; the scheme has also contributed to reductions in out-of-pocket spending on hospitalisation. Yet utilization, primary care coverage and last-mile linkages still need strengthening. (National Health Authority, 2025)

These realities show the dual need: scale health financing and insurance coverage while strengthening the public health backbone (primary health centres, workforce, supply chains, data).

Why CSR is not optional — it’s strategic for UHC

CSR is uniquely positioned to act as a bridge between private capital/skills and public systems.

1. Complementary finance- CSR funds can co-finance infrastructure, digital health tools, or targeted subsidies that accelerate public rollout without duplicating services.
2. Technical & managerial expertise- Corporates bring project management, supply-chain optimisation, data analytics, and digital product development skills that government programmes often lack at scale.
3. Innovation and risk-taking - CSR can seed pilots (telemedicine vans, AI triage tools, community nutrition models) that the public sector can scale after evidence generation.
4. Visibility & advocacy- Corporates can use their brand and networks to increase awareness, mobilize communities and advocate for policy change.

A recent string of CSR investments in India from hospital infrastructure and specialized treatment centres to large-scale health camps and telemedicine pilots illustrates how corporate resources can plug critical gaps (for example, corporate-funded specialty centres at government medical institutions and large-scale health camps at mass gatherings). 

Concrete CSR pathways that drive UHC (priority areas)

Below are practical, high-leverage investments CSR teams should consider each designed to strengthen public systems, not replace them.

1. Strengthen primary health care (PHC) capacity

Fund infrastructure upgrades for Health & Wellness Centres (HWCs), supply essential diagnostics, and support continuous training for ANMs/ASHAs and nurses. PHC is the first line of prevention and must be the priority for inclusion.

2. Invest in interoperable digital health & data systems

Support digitisation of facility records, telemedicine nodes, and dashboards that link local PHCs with referral hospitals. Interoperability reduces fragmentation and improves referral outcomes. 

3. Coalitions for specialist care & infrastructure

Coalitions for specialist care and infrastructure refer to public–private partnerships where corporates fund or co-create advanced tertiary care facilities such as oncology blocks, Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) units, cath labs, neonatal/paediatric ICUs or radiotherapy centres within government and AIIMS hospitals. Instead of building parallel private hospitals, CSR capital is leveraged to upgrade specialist infrastructure inside the public health system, while the government provides land, licensing, clinical staff and patient intake. In many cases, a knowledge or technology partner is also involved to support training and quality of care protocols. This model directly expands high-end care capacity, reduces waitlists at apex hospitals, and provides geographically closer and more affordable treatment, thus preventing catastrophic out-of-pocket expenditure for poorer households. Since these centres remain embedded within the government system, their benefits continue year on year, making the intervention both sustainable and high impact. Existing examples across India (as of 2025) demonstrate that such coalitions improve access to specialised care while also strengthening skills, referral pathways and digital clinical systems within the host facility, creating long-term systemic value rather than short-lived CSR assets.

4. Expand preventive and promotive services

Sponsor vaccination drives, NCD screening, school health programmes, and community nutrition initiatives integrated into existing government campaigns (Poshan, RMNCH+A). Preventive investments lower long-term costs for the system.

5. Finance demand-side protection for vulnerable groups

Provide premium top-ups, transport vouchers, or cash-for-care for the poorest to boost utilisation of entitlements under schemes like PM-JAY. Demand-side financing increases effective coverage.

6. Support workforce development

Invest in mid-level provider training, digital clinical mentoring, and incentives for rural postings. The health workforce shortage is a bottleneck for UHC.

7. Emphasise mental health, WASH and climate-sensitive health

Integrate mental health services into PHC, fund WASH upgrades at facilities and support climate-resilience measures (cooling, flood protection) for vulnerable clinics.

How to design CSR for sustainable systems impact 

1. Align with national/state priorities - map where government targets and funding gaps are, then co-design interventions.
2. Embed in public systems - Embedding initiatives within government systems is essential for long-term continuity, asset retention, and institutionalisation of services; however, doing this exclusively through government mechanisms can limit the agility, independent monitoring, and last-mile innovations that NGOs are better positioned to deliver. A balanced architecture works best, where core infrastructure funding, service integration, and policy alignment are channelled through government budgets or formal MoUs, while NGOs are strategically engaged for community mobilisation, last-mile access, social accountability, and third-party M&E. This blended model leverages the scale and legitimacy of the public system and the responsiveness and innovation capacity of civil society, ensuring sustainability without sacrificing effectiveness, transparency, or inclusion of hard-to-reach populations
3. Set measurable outcomes - use OECD-DAC / SDG indicators (service coverage, financial protection, equity of reach) and report publicly.
4. Scaling- Scaling should be evidence-led, backed by rigorous independent evaluations that assess real outcomes and cost-effectiveness before expansion. Neutral third-party reviews safeguard public value, prevent premature replication of weak pilots, and ensure accountability. Independent evaluation is not an add-on but a prerequisite for scale, enabling responsible, high-confidence investment decisions.
5. Plan transition & O&M- CSR should fund capital and early O&M but have a clear handover plan to government or community’s involvement for long-term maintenance.
6. Stakeholder governance- include local health authorities and community representatives in governance to ensure relevance and accountability.

‍